Risks.

Named risks, not vague hazards: each entry is a specific, recognised AI risk, with the controls that mitigate it, the clauses that cite it and the sources behind it. 169 risks across 16 categories.

Severity by category

A compact map of the whole register before you filter it.

CategorycriticalhighmediumlowTotal
Governance & Accountability–1110–21
Model Performance & Reliability–76–13
Data Protection & Privacy274–13
Fairness, Bias & Impact–45–9
Conduct & Customer Outcomes–84–12
Transparency & Explainability–24–6
Human Factors & Workforce–43–7
Model & Application Security–125–17
Adversarial ML & Model Integrity143–8
Agentic & Autonomous Systems1104–15
Generative Content & Information Integrity125–8
Intellectual Property & Legal Liability–53–8
Third-Party & Supply Chain–54–9
Operational Resilience–72–9
Prohibited & High-Risk Practices81––9
Systemic & Societal–2215

Browse by list, category or framework

16 of 169 risks shown.

IDRiskCategorySeverity
R-050Agent tool misuse An agent uses a tool it is permitted to use in an unsafe or unintended way, such as a destructive command or a wrong parameter, causing data loss, unauthorised transactions or disruption.Agentic & Autonomous Systems High
R-017Automated decision-making without safeguards AI is used to take significant decisions about individuals with no meaningful human involvement and without the safeguards UK data protection law requires.Data Protection & Privacy Critical
R-158Automation bias and over-reliance People accept AI outputs without the scrutiny they would give another source, and the system's errors pass into decisions unchallenged.Human Factors & Workforce High
R-001Excessive agency in autonomous agents An agent is given more functions, permissions or independence than its task requires, so an error, an ambiguous instruction or a manipulated input turns into a damaging action that no one approved.Agentic & Autonomous Systems High
R-057Human-agent trust exploitation People approve an agent's request or accept its account of events because it is fluent and familiar, so the human check that was meant to stop a harmful action passes it instead.Agentic & Autonomous Systems Medium
R-135Inability to stop or roll back AI A misbehaving system cannot be disabled, reverted to a known good version, or have its actions reversed quickly enough to limit harm.Operational Resilience High
R-121Inadequate contestability and redress People affected by an AI-supported decision cannot challenge it, cannot have it reviewed by someone with the authority and information to change it, or cannot obtain a remedy.Conduct & Customer Outcomes High
R-034Inadequate explainability for affected individuals A person materially affected by an AI-supported decision is not given an explanation they can understand and use to challenge it.Transparency & Explainability High
R-025Inadequate human oversight design An AI system is built with no human oversight, or with an oversight step that lacks the time, information, competence or authority to change an outcome.Governance & Accountability High
R-159Ineffective human review A human review step exists and operates, but reviewers do not in practice detect or correct the system's errors.Human Factors & Workforce High
R-167Loss of control of advanced AI A highly capable AI system pursues objectives or acquires capabilities beyond the oversight of its developer or deployer, and cannot readily be corrected or stopped.Systemic & Societal Medium
R-126No route to a human A customer cannot reach a person when the automated channel fails them, or the route to one is hidden or obstructed.Conduct & Customer Outcomes Medium
R-058Rogue agent behaviour An agent departs from its intended function or acts deceptively or outside its mandate, through misaligned objectives, emergent behaviour or a compromise that persists, while each action appears legitimate.Agentic & Autonomous Systems High
R-061Unauthorised commitments by agents An agent makes a statement, offer or transaction that binds the organisation, without the authority a person in the same position would need.Agentic & Autonomous Systems High
R-162Unfair algorithmic management AI is used in recruitment, task allocation, performance assessment or dismissal without fairness testing, explanation, human review or a route to challenge.Human Factors & Workforce High
R-120Wrongful automated refusal A system incorrectly declines, blocks or withdraws a product, payment or claim, and the person affected has no effective way to have it corrected.Conduct & Customer Outcomes High