For Heads-of · Practitioner

Mechanistic Interpretability

Research that tries to reverse-engineer what a neural network computes internally, identifying the features it represents and the circuits that connect them, in terms a person can understand. It is a research field, not yet an audit tool.

  • interpretability
  • sparse autoencoders
  • circuits
  • features
  • neural networks

What it does

Instead of explaining a model from outside, by observing which inputs change its outputs, mechanistic interpretability looks at the internal activations. Techniques such as sparse autoencoders decompose those activations into features that often correspond to recognisable concepts, and circuit analysis traces how features combine to produce behaviour. Researchers have used these methods to find, and in some cases adjust, features related to deception, bias and other safety-relevant concepts inside large models.

Why it matters

Testing can only find behaviour someone thought to look for. If a model's internal mechanisms could be inspected, hidden behaviour such as a model backdoor or an intention to deceive might be found directly. That is the long-term promise; today the methods cover only part of what large models do.

How it relates to explainability

It is the inside-out complement to feature attribution and other explainability methods, and the research frontier of model interpretability. For a deploying organisation it does not yet change what evidence to collect; the register entry for explanations that fall short is inadequate explainability for affected individuals.

Sources

Related Terms

Related risks and controls

← Back to Glossary